I really do tire of all these disparaging assaults. Taking things out of context, attacking my integrity, and other groundless "character assassinations" are totally unacceptable.Mayhem wrote:WW, I may be mistaken but haven't you in the past slated the 1984 system with the statement that there are a dozen ways to abuse the system that would NOT show up in the 1984 logs?
To now do a U-turn and say we can relax our rules because the logs are so good seems somewhat disingenious.
What i said, in this very thread, was, "considering all the bad behavior i can do with just one PC in ALFA, that won't show up in the 1984 reports, it seems rather silly to worry about all those things mentioned above that 'will' show up in the 1984 reports."
Rules in place that hamper gameplay, because of concerns associated with things that are managed by 1984, are rules that no longer serve its intended purpose. All 'non-meta' concerns associated with having two or more PCs are activities monitored by 1984. All meta concerns can be performed with just one PC. Therefore, the only remaining concern not addressed, is that of an opinion. This opinion holds that players will not dedicate themselves to one particular pc, and thus said pc will not be fleshed out ingame.
This last thing is an opinion, and it is an opinion i strongly disagree with. In another persistent world, i had five PCs. Each of the PCs was completely different in character and event-hooks. Each was full-fleshed, and three-dimensional. I enjoyed each of them for different reasons, and was attached to each as if each was my 'only' character. And while this is but one example, it is sufficient to demonstrate that this opinion can be wrong in some, or even most cases. Ultimately, a person who cannot full-flesh a PC when he has many PCs, likely cannot do so if he has one.